VITech logo

Marketing Analytics Dashboard

Executive Marketing Overview

Baseline snapshot built from GA4 (website + careers), VITech Team LinkedIn company page, leadership personal LinkedIn accounts, and the Sales Artifacts Tracker.

Active Sales Opportunities Using Marketing Assets
2
Evaluation stage
Cyber Alliance, Neovance β€” both awaiting feedback
Sales Pipeline β€” Qualified Opportunities
0
Flat at 0 across List 1 and List 2
0 of 36 target companies qualified so far (Jul 20 – Aug 17); this is an unreviewed backlog, not a rejection signal
Leadership Reach (SVP of Growth)
1,747
↓ 66% vs Jan (5,139); flat vs June
Monthly impressions; 5-month decline has plateaued
Leadership Reach (COO)
405
↓ 49% vs June (802)
Monthly impressions; SSI industry rank improved to Top 2%
Leadership Reach (CDO)
1,660
↑ 22% vs June (1,365)
Monthly impressions; only 2 months tracked so far
Website Sessions (Jul 2026)
2,186
↑ 37.7% vs June (1,588)
Excludes Ukraine, Slovakia, vacancies, jobs.dou.ua; monthly reporting since April
LinkedIn Company Followers
+72
Net new, last 90 days
Organic only; no paid follower spend
LinkedIn Company Engagement Rate
41.7%
↓ from 60% (May) to 22% (Aug)
90-day blended; monthly trend declining

Key Insights

What the data means for marketing priorities right now.

  • πŸ“‰Website engagement quality has fallen every month reported, four months running. Engagement rate has gone 31.74% (April) β†’ 15.93% (May) β†’ 11.65% (June) β†’ 8.33% (July), while average engagement time has dropped from 10s to 1s over the same span β€” even as sessions have more than tripled (690 β†’ 2,186). This is a consistent monthly trend, not a one-off dip, and needs a technical check (tracking, page speed, bot traffic) alongside a content read.
  • πŸ”—Direct traffic dependency is growing every month. Direct's share of B2B sessions has risen each month β€” 78.7% (April) β†’ 85.0% (May) β†’ 90.1% (June) β†’ 91.0% (July) β€” while UTM visibility has gaps: April and May have no retained campaign-level data at all, June's only retained window (Jun 18–30) shows just 5 tagged sessions, and July β€” the first full month with complete UTM data β€” still shows only 10 of 2,186 sessions tagged. The recommended UTM fix has not yet been implemented in any month reported.
  • 🌍Low-engagement geographies are now confirmed with hard numbers in all four months reported, not just a hypothesis. Singapore has posted a very low engagement rate every single month (1.66% in April, 1.08% in May, 0.62% in June, 1.95% in July), and Vietnam joined the pattern in June (0.99%) and July (3.14%) β€” both well below the US, which stayed above 35% engagement rate every month. The same pattern shows up on Careers (Singapore: 54 users, 3.7% ER, per the July report). This deserves the technical review the reports have been recommending.
  • πŸ“ŠThe SVP of Growth's personal LinkedIn reach has flattened, but well below its January level. Impressions were essentially flat Juneβ†’July (1,725 β†’ 1,747), members reached kept falling (538 β†’ 428), and follower growth ticked up slightly (0 β†’ +2). Five months of decline (Jan–Jun) appears to have stopped falling further, but there's no sign yet of a real recovery toward the 5,139 January starting point.
  • πŸŽ₯Culture and video content outperform on the company page. The single best-performing company post (Vyshyvanka Day, 1,742 impressions, 88.6% engagement rate) and the two recruiter/culture videos beat every service- or tech-themed post this period.

Attention Required

Items that need a decision or a fix before the next planning cycle.

  • πŸ“‰Website engagement rate is falling every month: 31.74% β†’ 15.93% β†’ 11.65% β†’ 8.33% across April, May, June, and July, with average engagement time now at 1 second. Four consecutive months of decline rules out a one-off blip.
  • πŸ“ŠLeadership reach (SVP of Growth) has stopped falling but hasn't recovered: impressions plateaued in July (1,725 β†’ 1,747) after 5 straight months of decline from January's 5,139, while members reached kept slipping (538 β†’ 428). Worth watching one more month before calling it stable.
  • 🏷️UTM tagging visibility has real gaps, not just low volume: two of the four monthly reports (April, May) have no retained campaign-level GA4 data at all, and even July β€” the first full month with complete data β€” shows only 10 of 2,186 sessions tagged, despite this being a standing High-priority recommendation in every report so far.
  • 🌍Singapore/Vietnam traffic quality is now a repeated, numbers-backed pattern confirmed in all four monthly website reports (April–July) and on Careers β€” worth the technical review every report recommends.
  • πŸ”»Company LinkedIn engagement rate is trending down month over month (60% β†’ 45% β†’ 24% β†’ 22%), even as impressions have been volatile.
  • πŸ—‚οΈSales opportunity outcomes are tracked manually, not through a CRM β€” the 2 active opportunities on the Sales Enablement tab are "possible influence" until a deal closes, by design of how this data is captured.

Recommended Actions

ActionWhy
Run a technical check on the website engagement-rate collapse (tracking setup, page speed, bot filtering)Four straight months of decline (April–July), now at 8.33% ER and 1s average engagement time
Confirm whether the SVP of Growth's flattened reach in July is real stabilization or noise before adjusting content plansImpressions held steady after 5 down months, but reached is still falling β€” one month isn't enough to call it fixed
Actually implement UTM tagging across LinkedIn, sales, recruitment, and email linksTwo of four months (April, May) have zero retained UTM data, and July's full-month tagged volume is still just 10 of 2,186 sessions, despite being flagged as High priority in every report so far
Request a technical review of Singapore/Vietnam traffic qualityNow confirmed with hard numbers across all four monthly website reports (April–July) and on Careers
Shift company-page content mix toward culture/video formatsVyshyvanka Day and recruiter videos are the clear top performers this period

Sales Enablement

Source: Sales Artifacts Tracker.

Active Opportunities Tracked
2
Artifacts in Use
5
Cataloged Artifacts (Total)
33
Confirmed Wins
0

Active Sales Funnel β€” Artifact Usage

CompanyStageArtifactCapabilityFeedbackStatus
Cyber AllianceEvaluationSportsIntel Case StudyLaunchpad; App DevelopmentDiscussing a potential Launchpad as a special arrangement (Jul 20 update)Waiting for feedback
Cyber AllianceEvaluationVITech: Launchpad (one-pager)Launchpadβ€”Waiting for feedback
NeovanceEvaluationVITech Company Presentation 2026Cross-capability / Company OverviewChampion on vacation; more Flow demo planned on return (Jul 20 update)Waiting for feedback
NeovanceEvaluationHealthcare Data Integration tech paperData Integrationβ€”Waiting for feedback
NeovanceEvaluationBioEQ Case Study (Launchpad)Launchpad; App Developmentβ€”Waiting for feedback

Both accounts are Sales-driven conversations where Marketing-created assets are being actively used at the Evaluation stage. Neither has a recorded outcome yet β€” classify as possible influence, not confirmed pipeline. This tracker, updated manually by Sales, is the source of truth here; there is no CRM integration behind it.

Artifact Catalog β€” Coverage by Funnel Stage

33 cataloged assets mapped to recommended funnel stage(s); a single asset can cover more than one stage, so bars sum to more than 33.

Coverage gap: Evaluation is heavily served (29 of 33 assets, mostly case studies β€” 10 of the catalog's 33 items). Awareness has only 4 assets and Closing has 7, almost entirely named-account pitch decks. There is comparatively little content purpose-built to move a prospect from first contact into genuine interest.

Sales Pipeline Expansion

Source: Sales Target Board (Priority Board), HealthTech Series A–C prospecting list. This is top-of-funnel target sourcing β€” a separate list from the active Evaluation-stage opportunities on the Sales Enablement tab. New batches arrive roughly every two weeks; each batch gets its own sub-tab below so nothing gets overwritten.

Companies Tracked (All Lists)
36
Tier A: 14 Β· Tier B: 11 Β· Tier C: 11
Companies with a Contact Path
27
75% of all companies tracked
Warm intro, potential path, or a named referral chain
Cold β€” No Mapped Path
9
25% of all companies tracked
Needs sourcing or cold outreach
Qualified by Sales
0
Field is blank for all 36
Not yet reviewed β€” this is a data gap, not a rejection signal
Companies Tracked
18
Tier A: 6 Β· Tier B: 7 Β· Tier C: 5
Companies with a Contact Path
14
78% of the list
Warm intro, potential path, or a named referral chain
Cold β€” No Mapped Path
4
22% of the list
Needs sourcing or cold outreach
Qualified by Sales
0
Field is blank for all 18
Not yet reviewed β€” this is a data gap, not a rejection signal

Companies by Priority Tier

Tier A = hit first (strongest fit + timing); Tier C = valid fit, lower immediate priority.

Contact Path Type

"Potential path" still needs relationship validation before asking for an intro.

Full Target List

#TierCompanyContact PathQualified?
1ALayer HealthWarm intro β€” Rob SheplerNot yet marked
2AFoundation HealthWarm intro β€” Ty Tolbert/Jason Gwizdala β†’ Andrei Naeymi-Rad β†’ Jacob MillironNot yet marked
3AXCaliber HealthWarm intro β€” Rob SheplerNot yet marked
4ACharta HealthPotential path β€” Anton β†’ Chris BattarbeeNot yet marked
5AArya HealthNamed chain β€” Matthew Mulski β†’ Beau Boyd β†’ Mason/AntonNot yet marked
6ANovelliaPotential path β€” Tom Zajac β†’ Nickolas MarkNot yet marked
7BDevelop HealthPotential path β€” Anton/Ty Tolbert/Jason Gwizdala β†’ ArmstrongNot yet marked
8BkeycareWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac, Beau Boyd, Chris AdamsNot yet marked
9BAnomaly InsightsWarm intro β€” Tom ZajacNot yet marked
10BKouper HealthPotential path β€” Ty Tolbert/Jason Gwizdala β†’ Andrei Naeymi-RadNot yet marked
11BConduit HealthPotential path β€” Tom Zajac may know Nickolas Mark who knows MollyNot yet marked
12BAmperos HealthCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
13BPercipio HealthPotential path β€” Chris AdamsNot yet marked
14CAnteriorCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
15CAutonomize AIPotential path β€” Anton β†’ Chris MooreNot yet marked
16CSuperdialPotential path β€” Tom Zajac β†’ Nickolas MarkNot yet marked
17CClariumCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
18CBartiCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked

Note: the "Qualified or not" field is empty for every company on this board β€” that's a gap in Sales' review process, not a signal that these targets were rejected. Two Tier A/B companies (Novellia, Percipio Health) list New10 as part of their primary offer fit; New10 workstream specifics are out of scope for this dashboard, so only the contact-path and qualification status are tracked here.

Companies Tracked
18
Tier A: 8 Β· Tier B: 4 Β· Tier C: 6
Companies with a Contact Path
13
72% of the list
All named as "Warm intro" this batch β€” no "potential path" entries
Cold β€” No Mapped Path
5
28% of the list
Needs sourcing or cold outreach
Qualified by Sales
0
Field is blank (a "Yes/No" placeholder appears for Keebler Health only)
Not yet reviewed β€” this is a data gap, not a rejection signal

Companies by Priority Tier

Tier A is more heavily weighted in this batch than List 1 (8 of 18 vs. 6 of 18).

Contact Path Type

This batch is binary β€” every company is either a named warm intro or fully cold, with no "potential path" middle category.

Full Target List

#TierCompanyContact PathQualified?
19AKeebler HealthWarm intro β€” Jason Gwizdala / Beau Boyd / David Henriksen / Rich WalshNot yet marked
20AKnit HealthWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac β†’ Nickolas MarkNot yet marked
21AHealth UniverseWarm intro β€” Kirk ElderNot yet marked
22AGravity RailWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac β†’ Jeff StolteNot yet marked
23ACarta HealthcareWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac / Kirk ElderNot yet marked
24ACitizen HealthWarm intro β€” Rich WalshNot yet marked
25ARisa LabsWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac β†’ Jeff StolteNot yet marked
26AMedsenderWarm intro β€” GeoNot yet marked
27BScispotCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
28BBrightHeartCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
29BHoney HealthCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
30BEnsoDataWarm intro β€” David HenriksenNot yet marked
31CAscertainWarm intro β€” Andriy S / Andriy β†’ Stephen Oesterle (LinkedIn)Not yet marked
32CHello PatientWarm intro β€” Anton N/Ty Tolbert/Jason GwizdalaNot yet marked
33CArintraWarm intro β€” Tom Zajac / Lindsey Bates / David HenriksenNot yet marked
34CDandelion HealthCold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked
35COpturaWarm intro β€” Rich WalshNot yet marked
36CProsper AICold β€” no mapped pathNot yet marked

Note: this batch adds a "Qualified or not" column to the sheet template, but it's still unfilled β€” Keebler Health shows the literal placeholder text "Yes/no" rather than an actual answer, and every other row is blank. Treat this the same as List 1: a pending review, not a rejection. A "LinkedIn" column was also added but only contains a generic "Profile" label per row with no distinguishing data, so it isn't reflected here.

Website Performance

GA4 β€” General Website / B2B (cleaned) and Careers, now on a standalone monthly cadence.

Scope note: April, May, June, and July are now four standalone monthly B2B reports using the same cleaned methodology (excludes Ukraine, Slovakia, vacancy pages, jobs.dou.ua) β€” the earlier Q1/Q2 quarterly view has been retired now that monthly data exists. The raw "Last 90 days" GA4 export (6,719 sessions, May 12–Aug 9) is unfiltered and includes all traffic, including Careers and Ukraine/jobs.dou.ua referral traffic β€” kept fully separate below.
Sessions (Jul 2026, B2B)
2,186
↑ 37.7% vs Jun (1,588)
Engaged Sessions (Jul)
182
↓ 1.6% vs Jun (185)
Engagement Rate (Jul)
8.33%
↓ 3.3 pp vs Jun (11.65%)
Avg. Engagement Time (Jul)
1s
↓ 50% vs Jun (2s)
Key Events (thankyou_clients / download_pdf)
N/A
Not tracked in the original July report; tracked from April onward below

Sessions & Engagement Rate β€” Monthly Trend, Apr–Jul 2026 ER DECLINING

Sessions have climbed every month while engagement rate has fallen every month β€” growth in volume, not in engagement quality. Four consecutive months now confirm this is a trend, not a one-off dip.

B2B Sessions by Channel β€” Monthly, Apr–Jul 2026

Volume: Direct, growing every month (543 β†’ 918 β†’ 1,430 β†’ 1,990). Engagement quality: Organic Search, every month. Two new low-volume labels appeared over the period: Paid Other (June) and AI Assistant (July).

UX & Behavior β€” Hotjar Γ— GA4, Q2 2026 (Apr–Jun) QUALITATIVE LAYER

Hotjar click/scroll behavior cross-checked against GA4 traffic, page by page. This is the quarter-level verdict; month-by-month detail is in the April / May / June tabs below. July is not covered by this report.

Keep
3
Homepage, Launchpad, Careers
Review
2
Flow, Problem-solving
Track
3
Technology, Case studies, Contact us
No Data
1
Case studies β€” April only
PageQ2 StatusWhy
HomepageKeepHighest reach; Hotjar consistently shows strongest interaction in upper routing content.
LaunchpadKeepHotjar process interaction is supported by usable GA4 depth, especially in May.
CareersKeepVacancy-first hierarchy is supported by Hotjar; June partial GA4 window recorded 82 /vacancies views.
FlowReviewLower proof repeatedly appears after scroll reach declines; GA4 samples remain small.
Problem-solvingReviewRepeated deep-scroll pattern exists, but GA4 volume is too small for a high-confidence structural change.
TechnologyTrackTechnical/PDF interaction is visible, but traffic is too small for a strong UX conclusion.
Case studiesTrackFocused layout looks healthy when data exists, but monthly GA4 samples remain small.
Contact usTrackIframe blocks form-level Hotjar analysis; GA4 recorded 0 β†’ 5 β†’ 2 client-form completion events.

Next measurement layer (recommended): instrument page-level CTA clicks on Launchpad, Flow, Technology, and Problem-solving; for Careers, track the funnel job_card_click β†’ apply_click β†’ form_start β†’ form_submit β†’ thankyou_careers.

Interpretation rule: Hotjar identifies behavioral patterns; GA4 supplies traffic, engagement, and recorded-event context. Small samples are treated as directional, and recorded form events are not treated as qualified leads without CRM/ATS validation.

Sessions (April)
690
Engaged Sessions (April)
219
Engagement Rate (April)
31.74%
Avg. Engagement Time (April)
10s
Key Events (thankyou_clients / download_pdf)
0 / 0
No cleaned client-form completion or PDF download recorded in April

B2B Sessions by Channel β€” April 2026

Volume: Direct. Engagement quality: Organic Search, by a wide margin.

ChannelSessionsEngagement RateAvg TimeReadout
Direct54323.57%7sLargest volume; materially lower engagement than Organic Search
Organic Search9978.79%27sStrongest engagement quality at meaningful volume
Referral2646.15%19sSmall volume with solid engagement
Unassigned195.26%1sLow-engagement / unattributed traffic
Organic Social20%0sToo small for interpretation

United States: 238 active users / 58.54% ER; Singapore: 181 / 1.66% β€” the US carried the strongest meaningful engagement this month, while Singapore added substantial low-engagement volume.

UTM Campaign β€” April 2026 GA4 UNAVAILABLE

Historical GA4 Explore data for April is no longer retained. This is not the same as zero UTM traffic β€” the campaign-level view for this month simply isn't available. Do not backfill or estimate.

UX & Behavior β€” Hotjar, April 2026 QUALITATIVE LAYER

GA4 page views: Home 472 | Launchpad 28 | Flow 24 | Tech 17 | Problem-solving 12 | Case studies 0.

Keep
3
Review
2
Track
2
No Data
1
PageStatusBehavior SignalTakeaway
HomepageKeepClick: Hero + navigation lead interaction; service/supporting clicks appear lower. Scroll: Upper page has the strongest reach; lower trust sections are weaker.Hero and service routes carry the strongest exposure.
LaunchpadKeepClick: Hero and process/explanation areas receive interaction. Scroll: What is Launchpad? and early How it works stay within strong reach.Core explanation stays high; GA4 adds a usable depth signal.
FlowReviewClick: Hero and early comparison are the clearest interaction zones. Scroll: Reach declines across the long upper/mid page before lower proof.Proof appears after reach declines; optimize cautiously on a small sample.
TechnologyTrackClick: Hero/capability areas and technical CTA receive interaction. Scroll: Core technical sections remain visible before lower proof weakens.Visible technical interaction, but volume is too small for a strong UX conclusion.
Problem-solvingReviewClick: Upper problem framing dominates interaction. Scroll: How we measure value appears after a substantial decline in reach.Key proof appears deep; validate with more traffic before restructuring.
CareersKeepClick: Vacancy area is a clear functional interaction point. Scroll: Openings appear before employer-brand content and retain strong reach.Openings stay high in the journey; April GA4 Careers history is unavailable.
Case studiesNo dataClick: Hotjar returned no heatmap for Apr 1–30. Scroll: No reliable April scroll sample.GA4 recorded 0 views; April Hotjar history is unavailable.
Contact usTrackClick: Core embedded area cannot be fully evaluated in Hotjar. Scroll: Page is short, but form behavior is not visible.Hotjar form behavior is unavailable; GA4 recorded 0 client-form completions.
Sessions (May)
1,080
↑ 56.5% vs Apr
Engaged Sessions (May)
172
↓ 21.5% vs Apr
Engagement Rate (May)
15.93%
↓ 15.8 pp vs Apr (31.74%)
Avg. Engagement Time (May)
5s
↓ 50% vs Apr
Key Events (thankyou_clients / download_pdf)
5 / 1
First month with recorded client-form completions and a PDF download; CRM validation still required before calling these qualified leads

B2B Sessions by Channel β€” May 2026

Volume: Direct, now dominant. Engagement quality: Organic Search; Referral is smaller but materially stronger than Direct.

ChannelSessionsEngagement RateAvg TimeReadout
Direct9188.93%2sDominant volume; very low engagement
Organic Search10667.92%24sStrongest engagement quality at meaningful volume
Referral2646.15%25sSmall volume with strong engagement and event signal
Unassigned185.56%4sLow-engagement / unattributed traffic
Organic Social1145.45%10sEngaged but very low volume

Singapore: 368 active users / 1.08% ER; United States: 155 / 40.70% β€” Singapore led volume with minimal engagement this month; the US remained materially stronger on engagement quality.

UTM Campaign β€” May 2026 GA4 UNAVAILABLE

Historical GA4 Explore data for May is no longer retained. This is not the same as zero UTM traffic β€” the campaign-level view for this month simply isn't available. Do not backfill or estimate.

UX & Behavior β€” Hotjar, May 2026 QUALITATIVE LAYER

GA4 page views: Home 374 | Launchpad 31 | Flow 17 | Tech 17 | Problem-solving 8 | Case studies 22.

Keep
3
Review
2
Track
3
No Data
0
PageStatusBehavior SignalTakeaway
HomepageKeepClick: Navigation and service blocks receive visible interaction. Scroll: Meaningful reach extends beyond hero; lower trust blocks are weaker.Service routes remain visible beyond the hero.
LaunchpadKeepClick: Hero, process and outcome content receive interaction. Scroll: Process content stays within meaningful reach before the final CTA.Strongest recorded depth among core service pages reviewed.
FlowReviewClick: Comparison content remains the strongest interaction area. Scroll: Reach drops before lower How Flow works / proof sections.High recorded time, but lower proof still sits after reach declines.
TechnologyTrackClick: Tech stack and Download PDF area receive visible interaction. Scroll: PDF/technical content remains within usable reach.Track the PDF path; May recorded 1 external PDF download.
Problem-solvingReviewClick: Upper value proposition dominates visible interaction. Scroll: How we measure value and later sections sit below primary attention.High average time is directional only on a very small audience.
CareersKeepClick: Openings, map/company content and navigation receive interaction. Scroll: Openings and global content retain stronger reach than culture sections.Openings remain primary; May GA4 Careers history is unavailable.
Case studiesTrackClick: Featured case and Read more attract interaction. Scroll: Short page keeps featured content in a strong reach zone.Focused layout looks healthy, but the sample remains small.
Contact usTrackClick: Direct email/supporting paths are visible; iframe remains a blind spot. Scroll: Main contact area is high on the page.GA4 recorded 5 client-form completion events; Hotjar cannot show the form funnel.
Sessions (June)
1,588
↑ 47.0% vs May
Engaged Sessions (June)
185
↑ 7.6% vs May
Engagement Rate (June)
11.65%
↓ 4.3 pp vs May (15.93%)
Avg. Engagement Time (June)
2s
↓ 60% vs May
Key Events (thankyou_clients / download_pdf)
2 / 0
Two recorded client-form completions; no PDF download this month

B2B Sessions by Channel β€” June 2026

Volume: Direct. Engagement quality: Organic Search. A new low-volume "Paid Other" label appears for the first time (1 session).

ChannelSessionsEngagement RateAvg TimeReadout
Direct1,4306.99%1sDominant volume; very low engagement
Organic Search9571.58%13sStrongest engagement quality at meaningful volume
Unassigned323.13%0sLow-engagement / unattributed traffic
Referral2540.00%7sSmall volume with solid engagement and event signal
Organic Social1060.00%13sHigh ER on a very small base
Paid Other10%0sToo small for interpretation

Singapore: 648 active users / 0.62% ER; United States: 216 / 39.74%; Vietnam: 203 / 0.99% β€” Singapore and Vietnam added large low-engagement volume; the US remained the strongest meaningful B2B geography.

UTM Campaign β€” June 2026 PARTIAL PERIOD β€” JUN 18–30

Historical UTM Explore data is retained only for Jun 18–Jun 30. This is a partial baseline, not a full-June result β€” do not extrapolate to Jun 1–17 or compare directly with full-month totals above.

CampaignSessionsEngagedERAvg Time
directory_profile3133.33%2s
directory100%0s
launchpad_awareness100%0s

Jun 18–30 only: 5 tagged sessions, 1 engaged session, 20% engagement rate, 1s average engagement time, 0 recorded Key Events.

UX & Behavior β€” Hotjar, June 2026 QUALITATIVE LAYER

GA4 page views: Home 377 | Launchpad 20 | Flow 10 | Tech 3 | Problem-solving 6 | Case studies 15.

Keep
3
Review
2
Track
3
No Data
0
PageStatusBehavior SignalTakeaway
HomepageKeepClick: Interaction spans hero, services, expertise routes and navigation. Scroll: Upper/mid content retains reach; lower final areas are weaker.Hero and service/expertise routes remain the main interaction paths.
LaunchpadKeepClick: Process/outcome content and next-step elements receive interaction. Scroll: Core process remains within meaningful reach; final CTA sits lower.Core process stays visible; GA4 still shows moderate depth on a small audience.
FlowReviewClick: Hero/comparison content continues to attract interaction. Scroll: Lower half remains materially weaker in reach.Recurring hierarchy issue; June volume is only 10 views.
TechnologyTrackClick: Technical content and asset CTA remain visible interaction points. Scroll: Upper/mid technical sections outperform lower final sections in reach.Only 3 June views; treat Hotjar interaction as directional.
Problem-solvingReviewClick: Upper problem framing remains the strongest interaction area. Scroll: Measure value / value creation / expertise content sits after the main scroll drop.Only 6 June views; do not treat the scroll pattern as a proven structural problem.
CareersKeepClick: Openings and company-life visuals receive interaction. Scroll: Openings remain high; culture content appears later as supporting context.Openings remain high; Jun 18–30 GA4 recorded 82 /vacancies views.
Case studiesTrackClick: Featured case remains the focal interaction point. Scroll: Short structure keeps featured content within strong/medium reach.Featured case remains visible, but 15 views is still a small baseline.
Contact usTrackClick: Email/location/navigation interactions are visible; form behavior is not. Scroll: Main contact content remains visible.GA4 recorded 2 client-form completion events; measurement gap persists.
Sessions (July)
2,186
↑ 37.7% vs Jun
Engaged Sessions (July)
182
↓ 1.6% vs Jun
Engagement Rate (July)
8.33%
↓ 3.3 pp vs Jun (11.65%)
Avg. Engagement Time (July)
1s
↓ 50% vs Jun
Key Events (thankyou_clients / download_pdf)
N/A
Not tracked in the original July report

B2B Sessions by Channel β€” July 2026 MONTHLY

Direct now accounts for 91% of B2B sessions (1,990 of 2,186) β€” up from 90% in June. Two new channel labels have appeared over the period: Unassigned and a first-ever AI Assistant row (1 session).

ChannelSessionsEngagement RateAvg TimeReadout
Direct1,9905.38%1sLargest volume; very low engagement
Organic Search9656.25%9sStrongest engagement quality at meaningful volume
Unassigned563.57%2sLow-engagement / unattributed traffic
Referral3345.45%11sSmall volume with strong engagement
Organic Social944.44%8sEngaged but very low volume
AI Assistant10%0sNew channel this period; too small to interpret

Singapore: 972 active users / 1.95% ER; Vietnam: 254 / 3.14%; United States: 171 / 35.87%.

UTM Campaign β€” July 2026 TAGGING DECLINED

Only 10 sessions carried campaign tags in all of July β€” fewer than June's partial-period count (5 tagged sessions in just Jun 18–30) β€” despite UTM discipline being a standing recommendation in every monthly report so far. April and May have no retained campaign-level data to compare against.

CampaignSessionsEngagedERAvg Time
launchpad_awareness6350.00%0s
agency_page300%0s
directory100%0s

Traffic-Quality Flag β€” Low-Engagement Geographies, Apr–Jul 2026 RECURRING PATTERN β€” 4/4 MONTHS

Singapore has shown very low engagement in every single month reported so far, and Vietnam joined the pattern in June and July. United States is shown alongside for contrast.

MonthGeographyActive UsersEngagement Rate
AprilSingapore1811.66%
AprilUnited States23858.54%
MaySingapore3681.08%
MayUnited States15540.70%
JuneSingapore6480.62%
JuneVietnam2030.99%
JuneUnited States21639.74%
JulySingapore9721.95%
JulyVietnam2543.14%
JulyUnited States17135.87%

Singapore and (from June) Vietnam contribute a growing share of monthly traffic volume while generating very little engaged activity, across all four reported months. Treated as a traffic-quality concern per the source reports β€” not confirmed bot traffic without technical review.

Raw 90-Day Snapshot (Unfiltered, All Traffic) DIFFERENT SCOPE

May 12–Aug 9, 2026. Includes Careers, Ukraine, and jobs.dou.ua β€” shown for context only, not blended with the B2B figures above.

Source / mediumSessionsShare
(direct) / (none)5,44080.96%
google / organic6409.53%
jobs.dou.ua / referral1872.78%
linkedin.com / referral751.12%
dou / banner470.70%
CampaignSessionsER
(organic)65861.25%
(referral)44856.70%
employer_branding4472.73%
launchpad_awareness3243.75%

Key-Page Behavior β€” Monthly, Apr–Jul 2026

GA4 shows the change in reach/depth; Hotjar (Q2 2026 UX/Behavior report) confirms where attention concentrates. Format is views / avg. engagement time.

PageAprilMayJuneJulyConclusion
Homepage472 / 10s374 / 5s377 / 5s390 / 3sReach has held roughly flat since May; recorded depth keeps falling
Launchpad28 / 18s31 / 24s20 / 12s27 / 23sSmall audience throughout; depth recovered in July after a June dip
Flow24 / 13s17 / 30s10 / 7s15 / 5sVolume has been falling since April; Hotjar flags this page for review
Tech Expertise17 / 22s17 / 8s3 / 6s14 / 15sVery small, uneven samples every month; treat as directional only
Problem Solving12 / 11s8 / 38s6 / 9s13 / 15sConsistently very small audience; Hotjar flags proof appears deep on the page
Case Studies0 / 0s22 / 14s15 / 12s10 / 0sZero April views confirmed in GA4; small but present May–July

Per the Q2 Hotjar UX/Behavior report: Homepage, Launchpad, and Careers are flagged Keep; Flow and Problem-solving are flagged Review (proof/content sits below where scroll reach drops); Technology and Case Studies are flagged Track (visible interaction, but traffic still too small for a confident UX conclusion).

Careers / Recruitment β€” Monthly, Apr–Jul 2026

GA4 Explore retention for Careers is uneven month to month: April and May have no retained campaign/session-level history at all (Hotjar-only), June is a partial window (Jun 18–30 only), and July is the first full standalone month with complete GA4 Careers data.

Careers-Entry Sessions (Jul)
343
First full month with complete GA4; April/May unavailable, June partial
Engagement Rate (Jul)
29.74%
thankyou_careers (Jul)
1
Direct / Bulgaria / desktop
/vacancies Page Views (Jul)
265

GA4 UNAVAILABLE Careers-entry sessions, engaged sessions, avg engagement time, and thankyou_careers are all historical-Explore-unavailable for April β€” not zero, simply not retained.

Hotjar evidence (full month): the /vacancies heatmaps show the page with the Middle Full Stack (Java + React) opening. Visitors interact with the upper Careers content and vacancy area and continue into employer-brand sections. Hotjar is behavioral evidence only β€” it does not provide applicant counts or a complete application funnel.

GA4 UNAVAILABLE Careers-entry sessions, engaged sessions, avg engagement time, and thankyou_careers are all historical-Explore-unavailable for May β€” not zero, simply not retained.

Hotjar evidence (full month): the /vacancies heatmaps show the Middle Brand/Marketing Designer opening. Attention extends beyond the opening into global/culture and company-life content. Hotjar does not prove application intent, applicant quality, or completion.

PARTIAL PERIOD β€” JUN 18–30 GA4 Careers Explore history for June is retained only for Jun 18–Jun 30; figures below are not extrapolated to the full month.

Careers-Entry Sessions (Jun 18–30)
66
Engaged Sessions
29
43.94% engagement rate
Avg. Engagement Time
14s
thankyou_careers
1
jobs.dou.ua / referral / Ukraine / desktop
Source / mediumSessionsEngagedERAvg TimeCompletions
Direct / none32721.88%9sNone recorded
Google / organic221254.55%14sNone recorded
jobs.dou.ua / referral11981.82%29s1 thankyou_careers
dou / banner11100%29sNone recorded
PageViewsActive UsersNote
/vacancies8260Main Careers landing page; 11s avg engagement time/session
Middle Brand/Marketing Designer1412Most-viewed named vacancy in this window
Junior C++ Engineer1311Comparable named-vacancy reach; already gaining prominence

Ukraine: 31 users / 56.76% ER (all dedicated completion evidence is from Ukraine); United States: 18 / 11.11%; Germany: 4 / 80%. Desktop: 41 sessions (62%, 41.46% ER); Mobile: 25 (38%, 48% ER). Funnel: 72 users reached the page-view step, 1 completed β€” a 1.39% tracked completion rate for this partial period only.

Vacancy mix rotated: Junior C++ Engineer is the top named vacancy in July (92 views) β€” already gaining prominence in June's data above β€” while Middle Brand/Marketing Designer, the featured opening in April and May's Hotjar snapshots, fell to just 18 views. Hotjar capture notes indicate two named vacancies closed during July.

Source / mediumSessionsEngagedERAvg TimeCompletions
Direct / none200189.00%6s1 thankyou_careers
Google / organic684160.29%8sNone recorded
Djinni / referral381334.21%0sNone recorded
jobs.dou.ua / referral292482.76%32sNone recorded
LinkedIn / referral33100%5sNone recorded
ChatGPT / ai-assistant2150%40sNone recorded

New this period: a small but real ChatGPT/AI-assistant referral channel has appeared on both Careers (2 sessions) and B2B (1 session) β€” worth watching as an emerging source, though too small to act on yet. Geo quality flag: Singapore was the largest Careers-entry geography (54 users) but only 3.7% engagement rate, echoing the same pattern seen on the B2B site.

Funnel gap (all months): job-card click, apply click, and form-start remain uninstrumented across every reported month, so the only visible funnel step besides the landing page is the final thankyou_careers completion.

Leadership Content (Personal LinkedIn)

Thought-leadership performance for three executives. Each tracks a different period β€” shown side by side for pattern comparison, not as one blended metric.

Monthly Impressions by Leader

SVP of Growth
Jan–Jul 2026 Β· flattened after 5-month decline
Jan Impressions5,139
Jul Impressions1,747
Change vs Jan↓ 66%
Change vs Jun+22 (flat)
Jul Members Reached428 (↓ from 538)
Jul Follower Growth+2
Profile Views (90d)204
COO
Mar–Jul 2026
Jun Impressions802
Jul Impressions405
Change vs June↓ 49%
Jul Engagement Rate4.6%
SSI (industry rank)Top 8% β†’ Top 2%
SSI Build Relationships15.0 β†’ 21.8 / 25
CDO
Jun–Jul 2026
Jun Impressions1,365
Jul Impressions1,660
Change vs June↑ 22%
Jul Engagement Rate4.94%
SSI (industry rank)Top 1%

Content Pattern Analysis β€” SVP of Growth (most complete dataset)

Documented directly from the account's own monthly content-analysis notes (April and June).

AreaWhat worksWhat doesn't
Content typeOpinion pieces, frameworks, lessons, analogies for abstract ideas, paired with a visualGeneric recaps, informational summaries, trust statements with no analogy
FormatShort text + real illustration; simple carousels (≀4 slides); real photosText-only posts; carousels >4 slides; multi-part series
Length~100 words220+ words
StructureHook or personal-story opener, short paragraphs, one point per postSequential series assuming carryover audience β€” reach dropped part-over-part (386 β†’ 223 β†’ 203 impressions in one series)

Interpretation: the account's own analysis attributes the reach decline partly to reduced content-type variability and reliance on sequential series. This is the account's stated hypothesis, not an independently confirmed cause β€” reach could also reflect seasonal LinkedIn algorithm shifts or audience saturation.

July top posts, for reference: "AI in demo vs AI in production" (370 impressions, 23 engagements), "5 lessons from 1st Launchpad" (336, 20), "Collaboration over negotiation" (246, 6) β€” short, single-idea, analogy-style posts consistent with the account's own guidance above. None of July's posts approached the reach of the January "Joining VITech" announcement (3,613 impressions), which remains the outlier for this account.

Business-Signal Coverage

Per the Data Processor rules, leadership content should be judged on business-relevant signals, not just reach.

SignalAvailable?Note
ICP profile viewsPartialTotal profile views tracked for SVP of Growth (204/90d); not broken out by ICP fit
Connection requests / DMsNot trackedFields present in exports but empty for all three leaders
UTM website sessions from postsNot trackedNo leader-level UTM attribution in current exports
Sales-call mentionsNot trackedNo source connects LinkedIn content to sales conversations yet

LinkedIn Company Page β€” VITech Team

90-day organic performance, May 11–Aug 8, 2026.

Total Followers
~2,300
Estimated from audience breakdown β€” platform export has no single cumulative total field
New Followers (90d)
+72
100% organic
Impressions (90d)
7,727
All organic; no sponsored spend in period
Engagement Rate (90d blended)
41.7%
Declining month over month
Page Views (90d)
1,367
Overview + Life + Jobs tabs combined

New Followers per Month

Impressions vs Engagement Rate by Month

Engagement rate = (clicks + reactions + comments + reposts) / impressions, LinkedIn's own methodology.

Page Visits by Month

Post Performance β€” All Organic Posts (90 days)

Sorted by engagement rate. Video and culture/values content lead this period.

PostDateFormatImpressionsClicksEngagement Rate
Vyshyvanka Day celebrationMay 22Image1,7421,48888.6%
Q1 conference recapMay 18Image46936279.7%
Demystifying RAG & vector searchJul 7Carousel62637462.3%
VITech Values: Social ImpactJun 9Image44623155.2%
AI Innovation Summit winnersJun 3Image38018954.2%
Value Creation Metrics w/ CDOJun 16Image1386247.1%
EVP survey carousel (5.4 yrs)Aug 5Carousel23210248.7%
Welcome pack unboxingJul 23Video728498.8%
Interview red flags (recruiter)Jun 24Video763397.1%
4th of July greetingJul 4Image21154.7%
Q2 charity / defenders supportJul 31Image30234.3%

Note: the two video posts (welcome pack, recruiter interview) drove strong impressions but weak click-through β€” video appears to build reach without pulling viewers off-platform. Values/culture image posts drive both.

Audience Snapshot

Top LocationsFollowers
Lviv, Ukraine333
Greater Hyderabad, India264
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine172
Kyiv, Ukraine98
Top Job FunctionsFollowers
Engineering902
Information Technology214
Business Development186
Human Resources114
SeniorityFollowers
Entry1,020
Senior865
Director120
Manager117

Audience is Engineering- and Entry/Senior-heavy β€” consistent with an employer-branding-led page rather than a buyer-heavy one. Business Development (186) and Marketing (63) followers are a smaller but relevant slice for ICP-adjacent reach.

Instagram Company β€” @vitech.software

Period: last 90 days.

Total Followers
498
Views
7,195
61.9% followers / 38.1% non-followers
Interactions
794
90.1% followers / 9.9% non-followers
Profile Activity
328
323 profile visits, 5 external link taps
Accounts Engaged
175
Viewers
1,110

Views by Content Type

Share of total views, all viewers (followers + non-followers).

Interactions by Content Type

Share of total interactions, all viewers.

Most Active Times

Follower activity by 3-hour block. Select a day to see its pattern.

Top Content β€” Views vs. Interactions

Ranked by views; captions are the visible on-image text from the source screenshots. Engagement rate = interactions Γ· views.

DateContentViewsInteractionsEngagement Rate
May 21Vyshyvanka Day team celebration2,200Not shown in this exportβ€”
Aug 14Team karting/track day group photo1,200504.2%
Jul 23"What's inside our welcome pack?" (new-hire welcome kit)987646.5%
Jul 26Corporate competition macro shot (bolts/hardware)799232.9%
Aug 4"5.4 years β€” average tenure at VITech" stat carousel721273.7%
Jul 31"VITech's Q2 2026 contribution: $265,450" (charity/defenders)443194.3%

Cross-platform overlap: three of these six posts are the same campaigns already tracked on the LinkedIn company page tab, posted within a day of each other on both platforms β€” Vyshyvanka Day (Instagram May 21, 2,200 views; LinkedIn May 22, 1,742 impressions / 88.6% ER β€” LinkedIn's single best-performing post this period), the welcome-pack content (Jul 23, 728 LinkedIn impressions / 8.8% ER), and the Q2 charity contribution post (Jul 31, 302 LinkedIn impressions / 4.3% ER). Vyshyvanka Day and the welcome-pack post are the two strongest performers on Instagram too, reinforcing that culture/team content travels well across both channels.

Aug 19 – Nov 16, 2026 NO DATA YET

This period hasn't started yet. When the next Meta Business Suite export is ready, share it and this sub-tab will be filled in with the same KPIs, charts, and top-content table as the current period β€” the May 20–Aug 18 data above will stay put as history.

Marketing & Sales Materials VITech

Central, browsable library of every VITech marketing and sales asset. Source of truth: the Sales Materials VITech spreadsheet's CURRENT assets tab. Master Drive folder: Marketing & Sales Materials.

Total Materials
44
Current
38
Archived
6
Categories
5

Filters and sorting only change what's shown β€” every column and row from the source sheet is preserved underneath, and this view updates automatically as new materials are added.